Religious topic: Baptism, At What Age?
Baptism: At What Age?
The question of at what age should people normally be baptized has come up in relation to the topic that recently I was asked about limbo.
In order to discuss this we first need to talk about what the purpose of baptism is. We will also find that we need to discuss what sin is.
For most churches the main reason for baptism is for entry into God's salvation. That concept usually includes entry into a church community, acceptance of God and/or Jesus Christ as one's savior, forgiveness of past sins, a new beginning, and the opportunity of everlasting life in heaven. Note that different religions put varying degrees of emphasis on the purposes that I just listed.
Some churches that emphasize baptism as a way to be saved and allow for entry into heaven promote baptism at very early ages, sometimes as soon as possible after birth.
Other churches emphasize the conversion aspects of baptism of changing one's life from previous sinful ways to a new way of living with God or Jesus. Those churches commonly promote baptism for people of mature age or fully into adulthood.
Sin, in the Catholic way of thinking, is an act by which a person turns away or blocks their relationship with God. In order to commit sin a person must have a knowledge that their action is harmful or evil. An unchurched person may not easily realize that their own evil acts interfere with their relationship with God but as people do grow and mature they should at least learn the difference between good and evil acts.
As children grow and mature, at what age are they able to distinguish between good and evil? That is a difficult question. Children can distinguish between right and wrong very early. But it is only much later that they can make the connection where a wrong act is also an evil act. For example, a young child may not want to eat peas and then picks them up and throws them across the room. Most parents will be able to instill the concept of right and wrong regarding such an act at a very early age. But is it an evil act? For a young child certainly not. Later when the child gets much older such an act might indeed be an evil act though as the child gets older the behavior of the act may change to possibly shouting some rather inappropriate words instead of throwing things. Catholic theologians have often used the age of six or seven for when a child is probably old enough to know when they are choosing between good and evil.
Why do I bring up the concept of at what age can a person understand evil and sin? The reason is that for most churches one of the reasons for baptism is for the forgiveness of past sins and for a conversion or a new beginning of turning away from sinning. For a person to understand such a conversion from sin would seem to require that the person be old enough to understand the concepts of evil and sin.
Because the different churches focus on differing aspects of the reasons for baptism and because those differing aspects have more meaning at different ages of persons, therefore there is no overall agreement among churches as to what age a person should be baptized.
Likewise many people, irrespective of their church affiliation, believe that personal choice is important and therefore they often believe that a person's religious choice should be made at an age when a person is old enough to make such important decisions. Those people tend to object to the baptism of infants and children who are too young to make such choices on their own.
I did find a study that was interesting. It studied college students. It counted students who were previously baptized and whether or not they were still faithful members of their churches at college age. The study also looked at what age the students had been when they were first baptized. The interesting finding of the study was that those who were baptized before the age of 12 were much more likely to drop their involvement with church. Those findings support the concept that I described above of at what age can a child understands the concepts of evil and sin. The person who presented the study results instead of relating the results to the age of understanding of sin instead related that reason to the age at which children become capable of the concepts of abstract reasoning. I believe that the two concepts (understanding of sin and abstract reasoning) are quite interrelated.
From my experience as a Catholic, a church which promotes the baptism of infants, my general observations are that unless a person baptized as an infant continues involvement in church because of their family they tend to be more likely to drop out in later life.
Also from my experience people who choose to join the church from college age or later do so with a firm intention and are more committed to church membership and participation in future years. Likewise persons baptized as infants who for some reason come to a church for a new beginning and purpose also are more committed.
From previous exchanges with my readers here I expect a greater support for the idea of baptism at a later age when a person can make an informed choice. My church, and many others also, promote the idea that children and infants should be baptized either for their "guaranteed" salvation or for the symbolic act of entry into their church.
Since there is truly disagreement among churches as to the preferred ages for baptism, it should also be pointed out that within those churches there are also internal disagreements as to what age for other church essentials such as the age for communion or Eucharist, the age for confirmation, and the age for confession or reconciliation. There are also disagreements within churches about the ages for marriages but those discussions are usually superseded by civil laws.
Recognizing that infant or child baptism does not lend itself to active church or faith commitment in later life, some churches promote re- baptism later in life as an adult.
The Catholic Church, and many other churches, believe that baptism is a one time thing that effectively changes one's relationship with God. Therefore they do not promote or even permit re-baptism. Instead, sometimes, ministers devise some form of recommitment ceremonies.
5 Comments:
Wow thanks for posting this. As it happens it is my belief that baptism should be done when the person can verbally communicate what the gospel is and why they need it. In other words does this person believe that Jesus died on the cross for their sins, and raised from the grave on the thrid day? Another important consideration would be are the fruits of the Spirit evident in the persons life. For example have they turned from their sins and are seeking to glorify God in everyday life?
You also mentioned sin. A key verse is
Romans3:22b-25 through faith in Jesus Christ for all who believe. For there is no distinction: 23 for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, 24 and are justified by his grace as a gift, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus, 25 whom God put forward as a propitiation by his blood, to be received by faith. This was to show God's righteousness, because in his divine forbearance he had passed over former sins.
I love this passage. It reminds me that God really does love me. God sent His perfect son so that I may be with Him. If you continue to read on in Romans 3 you see that we can never do any amount of good. It is through our faith in Him that gets us in to Heaven. God choose us not we choose him.
More later
Jen
Jen, you make very good points.
Hey, first time you've commented here (I think).
You don't seem to have your e-mail address listed at your site. I love all of your pictures, by the way.
I understand the concept of baptism but have always firmly believed that it should not be dine until the person understands clearly the path they ar about to take, understands and beleives the concept of god and is willing to follow that path.
A child has not sined so really they are going to heaven anyway so dont need to have water poured on them.
In Wayne Grudem's book Bible Doctrine he states 'Baptism in the New Testament is a sign of being born again, being cleansed from sin, and beginnig the christian life'. I also think it would be important to point out that Jesus was not baptized as an infant. It was actually John who baptized Jesus when He was 30. If we were suppose to baptize our infants don't you think God would have told Joseph and Mary to go baptize Jesus? As christian we try to imulate Christ. I could see baptizing my baby if that was when Jesus was baptized or if the bible clearly stated it was necessary.
We are also told in Psl 58:3
3 The wicked are estranged from the womb; they go astray from birth, speaking lies.
Another verse would be
Psalm 51:5
5 Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity,
and in sin did my mother conceive me.
Now both of these verses speak of how we are born sinners. As christian parents we don't want to think that our infants are also sinners, but they are. It is our duty as parents to raise them in the way of the Lord. Take comfort though that God has already planned your days.
Psalm 139:13
13 For you formed my inward parts; you knitted me together in my mother's womb.
So I teach my daughters that they are sinners in great need of a Savior! My husband and I teach them that they will never be good enough to earn their salvation. Salvation is a free gift from God.
I was baptized in the Baptist (Yankee division) Church at about 11 I think. Even though I've been a Methodist for more than 30 years now, I still believe that people should make their own decisions, not have the decision made for them.
Even though the Methodists practice infant baptism, they are flexible. I waited until the girls were old enough to decide for themselves.
Elcie is at confirmation age now (John Wesley carried over a lot from our original Church of England beginnings) but we agreed she doesn't really understand and should wait one more year.
Post a Comment
<< Home